These things gauge the desire to remain slim in pregnancy, the fear of pregnancy-related putting on weight, together with more tries to control/limit that it weight gain. Because of the a good validity (CFA efficiency) and you may large inner consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.8) of the one to-foundation design, one part (Factor 2) is actually chosen from the finally Arabic version of the scale, that was recommended having an excellent unidimensional design. The past Arabic variation (A-DEAPS) exists once the a good Most file 1: Appendix 1.
Discussion
Contained in this paper, i checked the fresh new psychometric qualities of the Arabic sorts of the fresh new DEAPS within the an example out of Lebanese women that are pregnant; this should assist surmount words traps and you may properly display screen to have “pregorexia”. Brand new authors exactly who to start with developed the DEAPS recommended a single-foundation design to the measure, and you can understated it to help you 14 factors to help the one-part model . By this data, the newest EFA efficiency produced a two-foundation solution towards Arabic variety of the dimensions, with the exception of product 8 (we.e., detected loss of control over restaurants). Regarding CFA, we hence examined about three measurement activities on the Arabic adaptation; the brand new CFA consequence of the initial design (14-items variation) and also the a couple-grounds design [Foundation step 1: Human anatomy Photo Concerns in pregnancy (3 issues), and you can Grounds 2: Disordered Food Perceptions while pregnant (10 products)] presented bad installing efficiency. Continue lendo “Factorial legitimacy from yet another one-factor model of the latest DEAPS”